• About
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Central/Eastern Europe
  • Eurasia
  • Latin America/Caribbean
  • Middle East/North Africa
Democracy Digest
Skip to content
  • About
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Central/Eastern Europe
  • Eurasia
  • Latin America/Caribbean
  • Middle East/North Africa

Foreign aid’s soft power ‘will send ISIS to same grave as communism’?

DemDigest    June 20, 2017 November 2, 2018   

Foreign assistance is an essential asset in addressing such vital national security interests as countering violent extremism, argues former US Senator Kelly Ayotte.

Democracy assistance programs supported by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the congressionally-funded National Endowment for Democracy are helping countries such as Tunisia to combat vulnerabilities to extremism, she writes for The Hill:

By deploying our expertise to support and strengthen democratic institutions such as the rule of law, representative government and free expression, the U.S. can help to stabilize and strengthen vulnerable countries and undercut the appeal of violent extremism. This approach complements military and counterintelligence efforts, and has been widely cited by military leaders as a crucial means of preventing costly future interventions.

Credit: USIP

Providers of foreign assistance in the West, the should accept a sobering conclusion: Where we can make a difference in transforming poor governance into better if not democratic governance, we have a clear self interest in doing so; but it is very hard to make a sustainable, transformative difference, according to Stanford University’s Stephen D. Krasner.

Many uses of foreign assistance are directly related to the threat to American national security posed by transnational terrorism, pandemic diseases, and other non-traditional challenges, all of which emanate from badly governed or weak states, he writes for The American Interest:

We ignore badly governed, failed, and malign states at our peril because even states with very limited capacity can threaten the security of the United States. It is easier to ignore these threats when straightforward, more or less old-fashioned great power issues take center stage, but it is still a mistake to do so. If states are reasonably well governed, at least if they have adequate internal security, then terrorism, potential pandemic diseases, and massive migrant flows can be better contained. If states are weak, failing, or governed by malign autocrats, our security challenges will be greater because of them.

“Democratic governance and human rights are critical components of sustainable development and lasting peace,” according to USAID. “Countries that have ineffective government institutions, rampant corruption and weak rule of law have a 30-to-45 percent higher risk of civil war and higher risk of extreme criminal violence than other developing countries.”

There is a bipartisan consensus that reducing foreign assistance will diminish America’s “soft power” and create a “Fortress America,” notes The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin.

Employing a wide range of tools is simply “making good use of government’s other resources to help protect America’s vital interests in the world…..including humanitarian relief, democracy promotion and economic development,” Senators John McCain and Tim Kaine write for POLITICO.

It is, though, very difficult to put failing, weak, or malign states securely on the path to democracy and a market-oriented economy, adds Krasner, a member of Stanford’s Freeman Spogli Institute and Hoover Institution:

The rich democratic countries of North America, Western Europe, and East Asia are historically the exception, not the rule. … Governments that occupy the Madisonian sweet spot—strong enough to maintain order but accountable enough to not be oppressive—have been and remain relatively rare, and there is nothing inevitable about more such governments coming into being. There is no natural progression from poverty to prosperity, from autocratic rule to democratic rule.

A modern liberal democracy rests on three major pillars, says Krasner’s Stanford colleague, Francis Fukuyama:

[I]t’s a modern state with the capacity to use its power effectively, based on the rule of law and on democratic accountability. These three pillars are in constant tension – if the state becomes too strong, it endangers democratic accountability and the rule of law, but, on the other hand, too much democratic accountability may paralyse the state. Currently, many of the populist leaders elected in legitimate elections are using their democratic mandates to undermine the rule of law.

“Modernization and economic development do have important consequences for political systems,” Fukuyama adds. “However, I never argued that this was driven by some kind of deterministic process which will inevitably lead people to liberal democracies. There is more human agency involved, much depends on choices made by individual leaders.”

Modernization theory’s assumption that higher levels of growth would generate a larger middle class which would serve as the social base for a democratic political regime has not been realized in practice (with the exception of South Korea), so the United States confronts a genuine dilemma, notes Krasner, who previously served as Director of the State Department Office of Policy Planning :

  • First, therefore, we have to work to change the incentives of leaders in relatively poorly governed states. Under the Bush Administration, the United States implemented a new program, the Millennium Challenge Account (MCA), which rewarded countries for doing well on third-party indicators of governance, investing in health and education, and economic openness. This program has worked. ….
  • Second, the U.S. government needs to improve its intelligence about and relations with potential leaders in the developing world. The preferences of political elites in developing countries can vary from gross theft, corruption, and repression to patronage (a much better form of corruption than gross theft), some economic growth, and security with limited repression. The U.S. government needs to be able to identify flesh-and-blood partners, real individuals, with whom it can work. This requires engagement and intelligence, and so requires a larger Foreign Service, not a smaller one.

RTWT

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someone
email
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Print this page
Print

Tags

@NEDemocracy Afrobarometer Alliance for Securing Democracy Anne Applebaum Anti-corruption Carl Gershman China China Digital Times civil society coronavirus Corruption Countering violent extremism (CVE) Cuba democracy assistance democracy promotion democratization disinformation Egypt Elliott Abrams Francis Fukuyama Freedom House Hybrid warfare Illiberal democracy information warfare International Republican Institute (IRI) Iran Journal of Democracy kleptocracy Larry Diamond Michele Dunne National Democratic Institute (NDI) National Endowment for Democracy National Endowment for Democracy (NED). North Korea populism Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) promoting democracy Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program Russia sharp power Soft power Solidarity Center Tunisia Ukraine Venezuela
Africa, Analysis, anti-corruption, Asia, countering violent extremism, Democracy and development, Democracy and foreign policy, Democracy and security, Democracy Assistance and Promotion, Democratic Development, Democratic Governance, Democratic institutions, Democratic Transitions, Democratization, Failed States, Fragile states, National Endowment for Democracy, South Korea    Countering violent extremism (CVE), democracy and development, Francis Fukuyama, John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, Millennium Challenge Account, Soft power, Stephen D. Krasner, Tim Kaine

Post navigation

‘Reckless Exploit’ – Mexican journalists, activists targeted by spyware
Russia’s test lab for cyberwar: social media ‘democratize propaganda’

Subscribe

Fill out the required information and check the box for "Daily updates from NED’s Democracy Digest blog" to get the latest news from Democracy Digest.

Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Subscription Preferences
Geographic Interests
Topical Interests

Search the Site

Archives

Recommended Reads

Review our comprehensive list of links to essential media resources.
  • Breaking News (13)
  • Newspapers (23)
  • Democracy Blogs (13)
  • Journals/Magazines (57)
  • Democracy Assistance Organizations (25)

Testimonials

Democracy Digest is invaluable.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Michael Danby
Former Labour MP, foreign affairs expert, Australia

Democracy Digest is an indispensable resource, providing valuable news and analysis on the challenges facing democrats and civil society, from authoritarian disinformation and kleptocracy to strategies for democratic renewal.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Anne Applebaum

Democracy Digest is an essential source for analysis of modern dictatorship, identifying democracy’s adversaries, while explaining their techniques and the threats they pose.  It is essential reading for anyone who cares about the future of freedom.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Arch Puddington,
Distinguished Scholar for Democracy Studies, Freedom House

An invaluable site for well-chosen, essential readings on democracy.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Thomas Carothers
Senior Vice President for Studies, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a leading authority on global democracy

Democracy Digest provides important thought leadership and editorial oversight, which has a particular urgency in the current crisis – Irwin Cotler, Chair of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Irwin Cotler

“Democracy Digest is the single best source of news and analysis on the evolving challenges to democratic governance and ideas for democratic renewal. For consistently engaging insights, it is indispensable.”

Director of the Program on Democratic Resilience and Renewal, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel.

“There is no other source for a ‘big picture’ narrative on democratic trends alongside perceptive accounts of initiatives and resources to counter resurgent autocratic forces.” – João Espada, director and founder of the Institute for Political Studies at the Catholic University of Portugal.

 

“Democracy Digest is the most focused and indispensable regular compendium of news and analysis about what is happening to democracy around the world.  Both scholars and practitioners of democracy depend on its invaluable daily flow.”

Larry Diamond, Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University; Senior Fellow, Center on Democracy, Development & the Rule of Law, Stanford’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.

“Democracy Digest provides consistently insightful perspectives on the challenges and opportunities facing democracy support efforts worldwide. I can honestly say that I read it every day. You should too.” – Ken Wollack, Board Chairman, National Endowment for Democracy; former President of the National Democratic Institute.

Credit: NDI

COPYRIGHT © 2022 · DEMOCRACY DIGEST
Privacy Policy
Ribosome by GalussoThemes.com
Powered by WordPress