National security still tied to fate of freedom, democratic solidarity



But support for democracy does not mean promoting revolutionary change in any kind of messianic fashion. It is striking to note that Reagan’s vision of democratic progress was evolutionary, even though his belief in universal human freedom was radical.Reagan’s vision of democratic progress was evolutionary, even though his belief in universal human freedom was radical. Just as President George W. Bush was caricatured for seeking to “export democracy” through the “barrel of a gun,” so Reagan has been occasionally projected as a naive utopian in his Wilsonian idealism. In fact, it was his supreme confidence in “man’s instinctive desire for freedom and self- determination” that convinced him—just as it had convinced previous American presidents, from Wilson to Franklin Roosevelt to John F. Kennedy—that the United States had a national interest in standing on the right side of history.

Indeed, polling by the George W. Bush Institute, Penn-Biden Center, and Freedom House shows that two-thirds of Americans understand the link between democracy abroad and domestic security.

Such sentiments find endorsement from the business community, judging by a U.S. Chamber of Commerce letter to Congress which strongly supports recent moves in Congress to enhance funding for the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and its four core institutes —the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, the Solidarity Center, and the Center for International Private Enterprise, the Chamber’s non-profit affiliate.

“Given the proliferating challenges to democratic norms posed by malign actors in several parts of the world, the increased support for NED programs endorsed by the Senate Appropriations Committee is appropriate, and the Chamber urges the House to support this robust level of funding,” the Chamber states, not least because of NED’s “cost-effective investments that advance U.S. national and economic interests.”

At least 59 US Senators have joined the American Democracy Month Council effort to promote National Democracy Month and reengage citizens by posting the famous quote by Winston Churchill below, which was spoken 72 years ago on Monday, November 11.

As authoritarian revisionist powers like China and Russia pursue policies to divide democracies and weaken allied solidarity; their focus on undercutting cooperation among democracies is another reminder of its strategic value, since American competitors consider it a challenge to their interests, IRI’s Twining adds.

Which is why it’s pretty shameful that democratic members of ASEAN, or the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, are demonstrating solidarity not with Cambodia’s beleaguered democrats, but instead blocking opposition politicians who are trying to return home to confront Prime Minister Hun Sen of Cambodia, Asia’s longest-serving authoritarian leader, the New York Times reports.

Cambodian opposition leader Sam Rainsy. Credit: RFA

“There seems to be a conspiracy within ASEAN to bend over backward to support an unpopular dictatorship in Cambodia,” said Charles Santiago, a Malaysian legislator and chairman of the ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights. “This is happening because some of the ASEAN countries have also denied a legitimate opposition from functioning in their own countries.

The Cambodian government should permit exiled opposition leaders to return to Cambodia and freely resume political activities, Human Rights Watch said today. As part of the crackdown on the opposition Cambodian National Rescue Party (CNRP), Prime Minister Hun Sen has threatened to arrest Sam Rainsy and other party leaders who plan to return on November 9, 2019, Cambodian Independence Day.

“After banning the opposition and staging sham trials to convict Sam Rainsy, now Prime Minister Hun Sen is blocking Rainsy’s return to the country,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “This is the culmination of three months of aggressive harassment, arrests, and attacks on the CNRP and its members, which is really about preventing the restoration of multi-party democracy in Cambodia.”

*This is the second in a series of three essays, commissioned by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute, examining the legacy of Reagan’s Westminster Speech and its relevance for democracy promotion today. Read the first installment by the National Endowment for Democracy’s Carl Gershman here. Coming Friday: a contribution by Richard Fontaine.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email