• About
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Central/Eastern Europe
  • Eurasia
  • Latin America/Caribbean
  • Middle East/North Africa
Democracy Digest
Skip to content
  • About
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Central/Eastern Europe
  • Eurasia
  • Latin America/Caribbean
  • Middle East/North Africa

‘Decades behind’ U.S. spurning opportunities to counter Russian propaganda

DemDigest    August 2, 2017 November 2, 2018   

The U.S. is “decades behind” in its efforts to counter Russian propaganda, according to a leading official.

“Until now, when we see it and the results of it, in the last year or so — now, your eyes are wide open and I’m like, ‘Hey, I’ve heard about this the last three years in Eastern Europe, and they’ve been living with this for decades. We are just now getting in the game. And we are decades behind,’” said Bill Evanina, the Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center.

“The government, private sector, and most important, the media, is not experienced in this. They don’t know how to differentiate between what’s fake news, what’s not fake news, what’s a botnet. Eastern Europeans know the difference. We have a lot of growing to do as a country,” he told The Cypher Brief’s Mackenzie Weinger.

Despite the performance gap, observers are expressing concern that opportunities to counter Russian disinformation and radical Islamist propaganda through the Global Engagement Center are being squandered.

An interagency unit based at the State Department that was created in spring 2016, the center replaced the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, and its staff of about 80 is responsible for coordinating government-wide efforts to counter the online messages of terrorist groups such as the Islamic State, writes POLITICO’s Nahal Toosi:

A Pentagon spending bill signed into law by former President Barack Obama in December broadened the center’s mandate to include battling state-sponsored disinformation campaigns by countries such as China, North Korea and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials say Moscow used fake news reports and malicious Twitter accounts to influence the 2016 election, and lawmakers in both parties have called for a more robust U.S. response.

Aside from its governmental coordinating work, the center also partners with the private sector to test novel ways to defeat false information spread by U.S. adversaries. One project has employed guerrilla marketing tactics to place anti-terrorism videos in the Facebook feeds of young people showing an interest in jihadi media. To help pay for such efforts, the legislation in December authorized the Defense Department to send the State Department $60 million in fiscal year 2017 and $60 million in fiscal year 2018, but the secretary of state needs to request the money from the Pentagon.

“Over the last five to 10 years, there’s been a tsunami of disinformation and anti-American propaganda around the world,” said Rick Stengel, who, as a former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy, oversaw the center. “The Global Engagement Center is one of the few, if only, areas in the U.S. government that could be tasked with countering and rebutting disinformation against America.”

“Congress has provided substantial resources to combat foreign propaganda, particularly from Russia. There is broad agreement that the U.S. Government is behind the curve on this threat,” said Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who co-authored the legislation:

Countering foreign propaganda should be a top priority, and it is very concerning that progress on combatting this problem is being delayed because the State Department isn’t tapping into these resources. The State Department should take swift action to fully fund the GEC and ensure that it is capable of carrying out the purposes Congress directed, particularly as they relate to Russia and other state-sponsored foreign disinformation.

Hamilton 68, a new website (right) launched today, aims to track Russian propaganda in near-real time, as it spreads via Twitter accounts linked to the Kremlin’s disinformation and other influence operations.

“The approach we’re taking is not about labeling anything as ‘real’ or ‘fake’, or exposing particular accounts,” said Laura Rosenberger, the director of the German Marshall Fund’s ‎Alliance for Securing Democracy. “We’re simply using analytical tools to show what messages this network is promoting,” she told Business Insider on Wednesday.

“In the Federalist Papers No. 68, Alexander Hamilton wrote of protecting America’s electoral process from foreign meddling,” the site reads. “Today, we face foreign interference of a type Hamilton could scarcely have imagined.”

Putin believes that “[o]ne way to undermine America’s standing is to provide disclosures that can be used by its own political factions, and the media, to sow distrust in America’s reliability as a democracy founded on transparency,” notes Edward Jay Epstein, author of How America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft. “Putin tells the truth when he says that it doesn’t matter particularly to Russia whether Clinton or Trump won the election: his goal was to install doubt in the legitimacy of the process, regardless of how it turned out,” he writes for the City Journal.

Ramzin Kadyrov, head of the Chechen Republic, echoes Putin in mobilizing prejudice and “state-sponsored homophobia” as part of an anti-Western narrative, according to Jonny Dzhibladze, an activist at Coming Out St. Petersburg, a local LGBTQ organization.

“It’s a combination of Christianity and Stalinism, two things that don’t [even] logically go together,” he tells Vox:

He attributes Putin’s success, and the rise of homophobia in Russia, to the same thing. “After the collapse of the Soviet Union, people saw the country they grew up in vanish overnight,” he says. Without a common, shared, cultural identity, they became easy to manipulate. For Dzhibladze, Putin has been able to rally his country by focusing on “the enemy from without” — the West — as well as the “enemy from within”: gays, who are widely seen as symptomatic of Western decadence or vice.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someone
email
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Print this page
Print

Tags

@NEDemocracy Afrobarometer Alliance for Securing Democracy Anne Applebaum Anti-corruption Carl Gershman China China Digital Times civil society coronavirus Corruption Countering violent extremism (CVE) Cuba democracy assistance democracy promotion democratization disinformation Egypt Elliott Abrams Francis Fukuyama Freedom House Hybrid warfare Illiberal democracy information warfare International Republican Institute (IRI) Iran Journal of Democracy kleptocracy Larry Diamond Michele Dunne National Democratic Institute (NDI) National Endowment for Democracy National Endowment for Democracy (NED). North Korea populism Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) promoting democracy Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program Russia sharp power Soft power Solidarity Center Tunisia Ukraine Venezuela
Analysis, Authoritarianism, Baltic states, Central/Eastern Europe, Civil Society, cybersecurity, Democracy and security, Democracy Assistance and Promotion, Democratic institutions, disinformation, Eurasia, INFORMATION WARFARE, Russia    Alliance for Securing Democracy, Chris Murphy, disinformation, Edward Jay Epstein, Global Engagement Center, Hamilton 68, information warfare, Jonny Dzhibladze, Laura Rosenberger, Propaganda, Rob Portman

Post navigation

Why advancing democracy matters
Celebrated Syrian democracy activist executed as support program ends

Subscribe

Fill out the required information and check the box for "Daily updates from NED’s Democracy Digest blog" to get the latest news from Democracy Digest.

Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Subscription Preferences
Geographic Interests
Topical Interests

Search the Site

Archives

Recommended Reads

Review our comprehensive list of links to essential media resources.
  • Breaking News (13)
  • Newspapers (23)
  • Democracy Blogs (13)
  • Journals/Magazines (57)
  • Democracy Assistance Organizations (25)

Testimonials

Democracy Digest is invaluable.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Michael Danby
Former Labour MP, foreign affairs expert, Australia

Democracy Digest is an indispensable resource, providing valuable news and analysis on the challenges facing democrats and civil society, from authoritarian disinformation and kleptocracy to strategies for democratic renewal.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Anne Applebaum

Democracy Digest is an essential source for analysis of modern dictatorship, identifying democracy’s adversaries, while explaining their techniques and the threats they pose.  It is essential reading for anyone who cares about the future of freedom.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Arch Puddington,
Distinguished Scholar for Democracy Studies, Freedom House

An invaluable site for well-chosen, essential readings on democracy.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Thomas Carothers
Senior Vice President for Studies, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a leading authority on global democracy

Democracy Digest provides important thought leadership and editorial oversight, which has a particular urgency in the current crisis – Irwin Cotler, Chair of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Irwin Cotler

“Democracy Digest is the single best source of news and analysis on the evolving challenges to democratic governance and ideas for democratic renewal. For consistently engaging insights, it is indispensable.”

Director of the Program on Democratic Resilience and Renewal, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel.

“There is no other source for a ‘big picture’ narrative on democratic trends alongside perceptive accounts of initiatives and resources to counter resurgent autocratic forces.” – João Espada, director and founder of the Institute for Political Studies at the Catholic University of Portugal.

 

“Democracy Digest is the most focused and indispensable regular compendium of news and analysis about what is happening to democracy around the world.  Both scholars and practitioners of democracy depend on its invaluable daily flow.”

Larry Diamond, Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University; Senior Fellow, Center on Democracy, Development & the Rule of Law, Stanford’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.

“Democracy Digest provides consistently insightful perspectives on the challenges and opportunities facing democracy support efforts worldwide. I can honestly say that I read it every day. You should too.” – Ken Wollack, Board Chairman, National Endowment for Democracy; former President of the National Democratic Institute.

Credit: NDI

COPYRIGHT © 2022 · DEMOCRACY DIGEST
Privacy Policy
Ribosome by GalussoThemes.com
Powered by WordPress