• About
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Central/Eastern Europe
  • Eurasia
  • Latin America/Caribbean
  • Middle East/North Africa
Democracy Digest
Skip to content
  • About
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Central/Eastern Europe
  • Eurasia
  • Latin America/Caribbean
  • Middle East/North Africa

Friends and Enemies: Understanding Chinese political interference

DemDigest    April 22, 2020 April 22, 2020   

Credit: FreedomHouse

United States intelligence agencies have assessed that Chinese operatives helped push disinformation about #Covid-19 messages across platforms, according to six American officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to publicly discuss intelligence matters, the Times reports:

The amplification techniques are alarming to officials because the disinformation showed up as texts on many Americans’ cellphones, a tactic that several of the officials said they had not seen before. That has spurred agencies to look at new ways in which China, Russia and other nations are using a range of platforms to spread disinformation during the pandemic, they said….Their broader warnings about China’s spread of disinformation are supported by recent findings from outside bipartisan research groups, including the Alliance for Securing Democracy and the Center for a New American Security, which is expected to release a report on the topic next month.

“What we’ve seen is the C.C.P. mobilizing its global messaging apparatus, which includes state media as well as Chinese diplomats, to push out selected and localized versions of the same overarching false narratives,” Lea Gabrielle, coordinator of the Global Engagement Center in the State Department, said in late March, referring to the Chinese Communist Party.

The Chinese Communist Party’s party’s expanding global objectives rest on Beijing hopes that its “global network of partnerships centered on China would replace the U.S. system of treaty alliances, the international community would regard Beijing’s authoritarian governance model as a superior alternative to Western electoral democracy, and the world would credit the Communist Party of China for developing a new path to peace, prosperity, and modernity that other countries can follow.”

Analyst Liza Tobin’s conclusions highlight the urgent need for all democratic countries to comprehend the full scope and scale of China’s interference abroad, to understand why interference occurs and establish general principles in the search for solutions, writes Matt Schrader, China Analyst at the German Marshall Fund.

In a new report, Friends and Enemies: A Framework for Understanding Chinese Political Interference in Democratic Countries, he identifies five components, which often interact with one another, that together characterize China’s political interference in democracies, he adds:

  1. Weaponizing China’s economy: Party leaders generate political compliance in foreign societies by communicating the benefits of cooperation, alongside the costs that Beijing can impose upon countries, companies, or individuals who step out of line.
  2. Asserting narrative dominance: In the global conversation on China, the party manipulates and controls information to downplay and crowd out adversarial narratives and advance those that serve its interests.
  3. Relying on elite intermediaries: The party relies on intermediaries abroad to shape foreign perceptions of China, often adopting many of the same ambiguous, opaque, and misleading methods that it utilizes to co-opt elites at home.
  4. Instrumentalizing the Chinese diaspora: The party identifies valuable diaspora members and groups in an effort to penetrate and co-opt Chinese diaspora communities.
  5. Embedding authoritarian control: The party’s way of doing business, and its efforts to demonstrate a viable alternative to liberal democracy, both strengthen authoritarian norms beyond China’s borders.

The European Parliament Research Service explains how foreign powers are using the #coronavirus crisis to increase their influence in Europe (image below).

The National Endowment for Democracy’s Christopher Walker and Jennifer Ludwig have described the application of this approach in foreign countries as “sharp power,” which is often conducted through initiatives in the spheres of media, culture, think tanks, and academia, Schrader adds. RTWT

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someone
email
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Print this page
Print

Tags

#NationalEndowmentforDemocracy (NED) #NationalEndowmentforDemocracy(NED) @NEDemocracy Alliance for Securing Democracy Anne Applebaum Anti-corruption Carl Gershman China China Digital Times civil society coronavirus Corruption Countering violent extremism (CVE) Cuba democracy assistance democracy promotion democratization disinformation Egypt Elliott Abrams Francis Fukuyama Freedom House Hybrid warfare information warfare International Republican Institute (IRI) Iran Journal of Democracy kleptocracy Larry Diamond Michele Dunne National Democratic Institute (NDI) National Endowment for Democracy National Endowment for Democracy (NED). North Korea populism Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) promoting democracy Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows Program Russia sharp power Soft power Solidarity Center Tunisia Ukraine Venezuela
Analysis, Authoritarianism, China, Democracy Assistance and Promotion, Dictatorships, disinformation    European Parliament Research Service, Friends and Enemies: A Framework for Understanding Chinese Political Interference in Democratic Countries, German Marshall Fund, Global Engagement Center (GEC)., Matt Schrader, National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

Post navigation

How China’s authoritarian model made Covid pandemic worse
When elections hurt democracy

Subscribe

Fill out the required information and check the box for "Daily updates from NED’s Democracy Digest blog" to get the latest news from Democracy Digest.

Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Subscription Preferences
Geographic Interests
Topical Interests

Search the Site

Archives

Recommended Reads

Review our comprehensive list of links to essential media resources.
  • Breaking News (13)
  • Newspapers (23)
  • Democracy Blogs (13)
  • Journals/Magazines (57)
  • Democracy Assistance Organizations (25)

Testimonials

Democracy Digest is invaluable.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Michael Danby
Former Labour MP, foreign affairs expert, Australia

Democracy Digest is an indispensable resource, providing valuable news and analysis on the challenges facing democrats and civil society, from authoritarian disinformation and kleptocracy to strategies for democratic renewal.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Anne Applebaum

Democracy Digest is an essential source for analysis of modern dictatorship, identifying democracy’s adversaries, while explaining their techniques and the threats they pose.  It is essential reading for anyone who cares about the future of freedom.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Arch Puddington,
Distinguished Scholar for Democracy Studies, Freedom House

An invaluable site for well-chosen, essential readings on democracy.

Read more Democracy Digest testimonials

Thomas Carothers
Senior Vice President for Studies, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a leading authority on global democracy

Democracy Digest provides important thought leadership and editorial oversight, which has a particular urgency in the current crisis – Irwin Cotler, Chair of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Irwin Cotler

“Democracy Digest is the single best source of news and analysis on the evolving challenges to democratic governance and ideas for democratic renewal. For consistently engaging insights, it is indispensable.”

Director of the Program on Democratic Resilience and Renewal, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel.

“There is no other source for a ‘big picture’ narrative on democratic trends alongside perceptive accounts of initiatives and resources to counter resurgent autocratic forces.” – João Espada, director and founder of the Institute for Political Studies at the Catholic University of Portugal.

 

“Democracy Digest is the most focused and indispensable regular compendium of news and analysis about what is happening to democracy around the world.  Both scholars and practitioners of democracy depend on its invaluable daily flow.”

Larry Diamond, Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University; Senior Fellow, Center on Democracy, Development & the Rule of Law, Stanford’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.

“Democracy Digest provides consistently insightful perspectives on the challenges and opportunities facing democracy support efforts worldwide. I can honestly say that I read it every day. You should too.” – Ken Wollack, Board Chairman, National Endowment for Democracy; former President of the National Democratic Institute.

Credit: NDI

COPYRIGHT © 2022 · DEMOCRACY DIGEST
Privacy Policy
Ribosome by GalussoThemes.com
Powered by WordPress